﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>PerkinElmer Discussion Forum / Radiometric Detection / Instrumentation </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>PerkinElmer Discussion Forum</description><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/</link><webMaster>techsupport@perkinelmer.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:26:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Karl Fischer</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic213-17-1.aspx</link><description>Can anyone here give me a clear and simple definition of what the drift is on the Karl Fischer?  I work in an ethanol plant and am finding it difficult to explain what the drift is exactly.  &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:49:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Ethanol </dc:creator></item><item><title>Wizard 2470 normalization for unknowns</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic212-17-1.aspx</link><description>What are the issues with normalizing an isotope with a differnent isotope?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for example using I-129 to normalize for I-131 or F-18&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it just that the system wants to see any peak? Or is normalizing with a different isotope leading to problems with accurate quantification? If normalization provides a PMT gain adjustment, wouldn't the peak position be important?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your thoughts?</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:54:04 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Wizard WorkOut</dc:creator></item><item><title>Open Normalization</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic207-17-1.aspx</link><description>Our 1480's hard drive crashed and we had to reinstall all software.  As such, we have to reacquire all normalizations.  Our problem is how to acquire an 'Open' isotope normalization.  Initially, an open normalization does not make sense to me, but more importantly, how does one do it.  I can make a rack, but we obviously dont have a 50-200kpm 'Open' source hanging around.  Do we run the rack without a source, or do we grab any handy source?  Any recommendations?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use the 'Open' source definition primarily for wipe test, but do have a few other applications we want a large &amp;#119;indow.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:54:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SWuser</dc:creator></item><item><title>Quench curve importation with Tricarb 2700</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic206-17-1.aspx</link><description>How to import a quench curve with a Tricarb 2700 ?&lt;br&gt;We have the .DAT and output files (it has been constructed&lt;br&gt;with the same Tricarb but has been erased)</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:46:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>nmireault</dc:creator></item><item><title>Difference between Tricarb 2700 and 3100</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic205-17-1.aspx</link><description>The same samples (H3, C14 and H3/C14) are analyzed on both &lt;br&gt;a Tricarb 2700 and a Tricarb 3100.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The protocol is identical (same sample preparation, same counting time,&lt;br&gt;same quench indicator tSIE, and the same protocol to &lt;br&gt;construct the quench curves for H3 and C14).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if they have the same 3 regions configured&lt;br&gt;(CPM A : 0,5 - 12.5 keV associated to H3, &lt;br&gt;CPM B : 20 - 156 keV associated to C14&lt;br&gt;and CPM C : 156 - 2000 keV),&lt;br&gt; they don't yield the same CPM values... &lt;br&gt;I don't understand why.  &lt;br&gt;Both Tricarb models measure about the same tSIE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially in case&lt;br&gt;the samples have both H3 and C14, the&lt;br&gt;calculated H3 concentration can reach up to twice&lt;br&gt;the known value for the Tricarb 3100, while&lt;br&gt;the Tricarb 2700 succeed in its evaluation of&lt;br&gt;both H3 and C14 concentrations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Tricarb 2700 seem to use strange efficiency&lt;br&gt;for H3 (from 5% up to 75% while we should obtain around 45%&lt;br&gt;by looking on its H3 quench curve).  &lt;br&gt;The Tricarb 3100 seems to really use the efficiency&lt;br&gt;we see on its quench curves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there additional calculation/correction that the Tricarb 2700 &lt;br&gt;performs ?</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:19:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>nmireault</dc:creator></item><item><title>aquasol II</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic201-17-1.aspx</link><description>The CPM A (region defined from 0.5 to 12.5 keV)&lt;br&gt;obtained from a C-14 water analysis in aquasol II&lt;br&gt;is varying a  lot using a Tricarb 2700.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;can reach up to 500 CPM&lt;br&gt;as usually it was kept under 30 CPM...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Protocol is using 6mL NaOH 0,4 N&lt;br&gt;with 15 mL Aquasol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That behavior has been first observed&lt;br&gt;during last year... has the formulation changed ???&lt;br&gt;Is there any new chemical that would interfere ?&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:16:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>nmireault</dc:creator></item><item><title>quench curve ??</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic200-17-1.aspx</link><description>using a Tricarb 3100, how is the quench curve (% efficiency vs tSIE) used for DPM assays&lt;br&gt;calculated ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;what is it's mathematical expression ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;how to get it's parameters from the software Quantasmart ?&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:10:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>nmireault</dc:creator></item><item><title>Direct DPM feature on Tri-Carb be</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic173-17-1.aspx</link><description>Can the Direct DPM feature on the Tri-Carb be used for all radionculides.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there limitations of its use?</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:18:56 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>68blucjp</dc:creator></item><item><title>WIZARD</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic172-17-1.aspx</link><description>Can I use WorkOut 2.5 with older Wizards 1470/1480?</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:15:49 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>WIZUSER</dc:creator></item><item><title>MicroBeta use</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic171-17-1.aspx</link><description>What cocktails should I use for counting filters? For counting in Microplates? What about MicroScint cocktails?</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:12:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>MBuser</dc:creator></item><item><title>WIZARD GAMMA COUNTER</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic164-17-1.aspx</link><description>In another thread, Nuc4U mentioned saving data with Uterm III. What is it and can I use it to save data files on my Wizard.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:45:03 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>WIZUSER</dc:creator></item><item><title>MicroBeta Use</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic162-17-1.aspx</link><description>I am using several different isotopes and types of samples.  How often do I need to normalize.  And for what combinations of isotope and sample type.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:09:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>MBuser</dc:creator></item><item><title>Low level counting cocktail</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic166-17-1.aspx</link><description>What would you recommend as a cocktail for counting ca 10DPM of C14. This is an animal tissue sample which I've solubilized using solvable</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:01:30 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>WizardMcTriCarb</dc:creator></item><item><title>Wizard 1470/1480 User Questions</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic161-17-1.aspx</link><description>How do I put in patient numbers or sample id's to be included in my data printout?</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:13:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>WIZUSER</dc:creator></item><item><title>Heterogeneity monitor in TriCarb LSC´s</title><link>http://forums.perkinelmer.com/Topic154-17-1.aspx</link><description>Recently I measured a few 14C samples and as usual I activated the heterogeneity monitor. After the measurement the software indicated an inhomogeneity in one of the samples. However, after inspection of the sample it was clear that the sample was homogeneous. Do you have an explanation?</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:25:34 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>